Web1 feb. 2024 · Why Most Published Research Findings Are False. J. Ioannidis; Business. PLoS medicine. 2005; TLDR. Simulations show that for most study designs and settings, it is more likely for a research claim to be false than true. Expand. 7,295. PDF. Save. Alert. WebJohn P. A. Ioannidis is in the Department of Hygiene and Epidemiology, University of Ioannina School of Medicine, Ioannina, Greece, and Institute for Clinical Research and …
Why most published research findings are false - PubMed
Web12 sep. 2024 · To highlight uncertain norms in authorship, John P. A. Ioannidis, Richard Klavans and Kevin W. Boyack identified the most prolific scientists of recent years. Web24 dec. 2024 · John P. A. Ioannidis is a rock star in the world of science (wikipedia). By traditional standards of science, he is one of the most prolific and influential scientists … portfolio management textbook
Why most published meta-analysis findings are false
Web31 jan. 2024 · Ioannidis wrote an influential article that used hypothetical scenarios to make the prediction that most published results are false positives. Although this article is often cited as if it contained evidence to support this claim, … Web10 aug. 2024 · At the same time, many sciences are facing a crisis of confidence in published results. The influential article “Why most published research findings are false” suggested that many published significant results are false discoveries (Ioannidis, 2005). One limitation of Ioannidis’s article was the reliance on a variety of unproven assumptions. Web15 jan. 2024 · Thus, Ioannidis’s claim that most published results are false implies that there are no more than 9.5 significant results for every 100 attempts. The novel contribution of shifting from rates to risk is clear when Ioannidis writes that “it is unavoidable that one should make approximate assumptions on how many relationships are expected to be portfolio management university of waterloo